![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: HPA or CO2? | |||
| HPA | | 172 | 71.67% |
| CO2 | | 68 | 28.33% |
| Voters: 240. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Re: HPA vs C02 Quote:
__________________ You can't wipe a welt -J Paintball FAQ's | Asking yourself "What should I get next?" | Paint & Barrel Facts | Fixing the Chop HPA vs. CO2 | Regulator FAQ's | To Remote or Not To Remote | Slide Checks 101 | LPK FAQ's Complete A-5 Maintenance | Complete T-8 Maintenance | Which Vest is for Me? | Secondary Sights | Rails, Sights, & Targeting Sale - Custom Vests, MOLLE Gear, Dogleg Stock, & More |
| ||||
| Re: HPA vs C02 HPA. if you can afford the tank, it last really long if you get a good one. I have a 70/45 stubby and it lasted me like 2-3 days of play running it through my Proto Matrix 7. It runs alot cleaner and easier on your gun too. Quote:
what i was going to say. Only question i have is, does pure nitrogen last any longer than HPA?
__________________ A5 sale. E-grip, J&J, Co2 tanks, and more. http://www.a5og.net/paintball-buy-se...tml#post257480 |
| ||||
| Re: HPA vs C02 Quote:
There are some fields that actually do use nitrogen. If they buy compressed gas, as opposed to owning their own compressor, it's most likely nitrogen. This is because the only pre-filled compressed air cylinders you can buy are filled with medical grade air, which is more expensive than nitrogen. This is becoming less and less common these days with the lower prices on compressors though. You can now get a 4500 psi compressor for under $3000, where as back when Nitro/HPA first started to be used in paintball it cost over $10000 for a 3000 psi compressor. So back in the old days fields would just buy compressed nitrogen tanks because it was cheaper. That's why they're often called nitro tanks, because that's what they were originally filled with.
__________________ ![]() A5, 12" PPS Brass (.690) with Apex tip, Tacamo HK 416 shroud, Tacamo AK-47 Sight Cover, JCS Gold Powertube, E-Grip (APE), Core CQB Wire Stock w/ RVA, Palmer Inline Stabilizer, Lapco Cyclone Ratchet, 450 round Hopper, 48 oz CO2 with remote line |
| |||
| Re: HPA vs C02 I didnt vote, i haven't used both. i have a 24oz co2 tank as of right now, attached to a remote line. it's an aluminum tank (as opposed to steel commonly used in CO2 tanks) so it's a bit lighter. my velocity (NO REGULATORS) honestly stays within 10fps, usually less, which i'm happy with. i haven't tried colder weather yet, but i have a scenario coming up on october 12th, so we'll see how that goes. i plan to get a nice huge HPA tank and use it, but sinc ei have a response trigger i'm probably going to still use CO2 some of the time.
__________________ Proud Canadian Baller ![]() Kit: A5, camo job, polished internals, 14" Smart Parts Progressive barrel. Borrowed Opsgear G36 stock. 24oz CO2 w/ remote and slide check. Neat homemade sling. MORE TO COME Vents Goggles and Multicam |
| ||||
| Re: HPA vs C02 Quote:
Dude, those air pumps sound pretty cool.. what brand is it, I will see if I can get one here in NZ |
| ||||
| Re: HPA vs C02 I hav a couple of questions... For somebody who uses both HPA and Co2 do you ever notice a difference in the report through the same barrel obviously?? I would think that one would be just as loud as the other!? But i'm interested to know? The other thing is should an HPA tank be completly empty before filling or can it be filled when at half level? Thanks in advance! :-)
__________________ "From this day till the ending of this world. We in it shall be remembered, We few, We happy few. For he who sheds his blood with me today shall be my brother" - Band Of Brothers |